How can principles of faith be applied in marriage
Amy and her husband, Brett, prayed about and pondered this counsel and felt it would be a good idea for their family to spend more time together at home. For one year, they chose to forgo dance and sports; instead they prepared meals, learned Primary songs, visited museums, and played outdoors. Amy and Brett prayed to know how they should personally follow the counsel of modern prophets, and doing so allowed them to receive inspiration for their family.
The following teachings from Church leaders, examples from the life of Jesus Christ, and visual images give us a closer look at these nine principles and ways we can apply them. There is no other foundation in life that can bring the same peace, joy, and hope.
In uncertain and difficult times, faith is truly a spiritual gift worthy of our utmost efforts. We can give our children education, lessons, athletics, the arts, and material possessions, but if we do not give them faith in Christ, we have given little. Elder Kevin W.
The object of prayer is not to change the will of God, but to secure for ourselves and for others blessings that God is already willing to grant, but that are made conditional on our asking for them. The multitude then came forward with their sick, and Jesus healed them one by one. The Savior then commanded the little children to be brought to Him and commanded the multitude to kneel down. He knelt in the midst of the children and began praying. These goods, even though the spouses are not aware of it, come from God the Creator and are included, in a certain inchoative way, in the marital love that unites Christ with his Church.
It would thus be contradictory to say that Christians, baptized in the Catholic Church, might really and truly take a step backward [and be] content with a nonsacramental marital state. Still we cannot exclude cases where the conscience of even some Christians is deformed by ignorance or invincible error.
They come to believe sincerely that they are able to contract marriage without receiving the sacrament. In such a situation, on the one hand, they are unable to contract a valid sacramental marriage because they lack any faith and lack the intention of doing what the Church wishes.
On the other hand, they still have the natural right to contract marriage. In such circumstances they are capable of giving and accepting one another as spouses because they intend to contract an irrevocable commitment.
This mutual and irrevocable self-giving creates a psychological relationship between them that by its internal structure is different from a transitory relationship. Still this relationship, even if it resembles marriage, cannot in any way be recognized by the Church as a nonsacramental conjugal society. For the Church, no natural marriage separated from the sacrament exists for baptized persons, but only natural marriage elevated to the dignity of a sacrament.
It is therefore wrong and very dangerous to introduce within the Christian community the practice of permitting the couple to celebrate successively various wedding ceremonies on different levels, even though they be connected, or to allow a priest or deacon to assist at or read prayers on the occasion of a nonsacramental marriage that baptized persons wish to celebrate. In a pluralistic society, the public authority of the state can impose on the engaged a public ceremony through which they publicly profess their status as spouses.
The state can furthermore make laws that regulate in a precise and correct manner the civil effects deriving from marriage, as well as rights and duties regarding the family.
The Catholic faithful ought to be adequately instructed that these official formalities, commonly called civil marriage, do not constitute real matrimony for them, except in cases when—through dispensation from the canonical form or because of a very prolonged absence of a qualified Church witness—the civil ceremony itself can serve as an extraordinary canonical form for the celebration of the sacrament of matrimony cf.
For non-Christians and often even for non-Catholic Christians, this civil ceremony can have constitutive value both as legitimate marriage and as sacramental marriage. This principle applies despite certain texts that are hard to interpret and examples of indulgence—the extension and frequency of which are difficult to judge—toward persons in very difficult situations.
The Council of Trent declared that the Church has not erred when it has taught and teaches, in accordance with the doctrine of the Gospel and the apostles, that the marriage bond cannot be broken through adultery. It cannot be said, then, that the Council had the intention of solemnly defining marriage s indissolubility as a truth of faith.
DS Intrinsic indissolubility of matrimony can be considered under various aspects and grounded in various ways:. Their intimate conjugal union as a mutual donation of two persons, just as their very marital love itself and the welfare of the offspring, demands that indissoluble unity.
From the human act by which the spouses give and accept each other rises a bond, based on the will of God and written in nature as created, independent of human authority and removed from the sphere of power of the spouses, and thus intrinsically indissoluble.
The final and deepest basis for the indissolubility of Christian matrimony lies in the fact that it is the image, sacrament, and witness of the indissoluble union between Christ and the Church that has been called the bonum sacramenti. In this sense indissolubility becomes a moment of grace. Indissolubility is demanded by the institution of marriage itself.
This is for the good of the offspring and for the common good. This is the juridico-ecclesial dimension of matrimony. These various aspects are intimately tied together. The fidelity to which the spouses are held and which ought to be protected by society, especially by the ecclesial community, is demanded by God the Creator and by Christ who makes it possible through his grace. Hand in hand with the practice, the Church has elaborated a doctrine concerning its powers over marriages, clearly indicating its scope and limits.
The Church acknowledges that it does not have any power to invalidate a sacramental marriage that is concluded and consummated ratum et consummatum.
For very serious reasons and with concern for the good of the Faith and the salvation of souls, all other marriages can be invalidated by competent Church authority or—according to another interpretation—can be declared self-invalidating. This doctrine is nothing more than an individual example of the theory, today more or less generally accepted by Catholic theologians, on the evolution of Christian doctrine in the Church. Neither is it to be excluded that the Church can further define the concepts of sacramentality and consummation by explaining them even better, so that the whole doctrine on the indissolubility of marriage can be put forward in a deeper and more precise presentation.
If she does separate, she must either remain single or become reconciled to him again. It follows from this that new unions following divorce under civil law cannot be considered regular or legitimate. This severity does not derive from a purely disciplinary law or from a type of legalism. It is rather a judgment pronounced by Jesus himself Mk ff. Understood in this way, this harsh norm is a prophetic witness to the irreversible fidelity of love that binds Christ to his Church.
The incompatibility of the state of remarried divorced persons with the precept and mystery of the Paschal love of the Lord makes it impossible for these people to receive, in the Eucharist, the sign of unity with Christ.
Access to eucharistic Communion can only be had through penitence, which implies detestation of the sin committed and the firm purpose of not sinning again cf. A man should examine himself first; only then should he eat of the bread and drink of the cup. While this illegitimate situation does not permit a life of full communion with the Church, still Christians who find themselves in this state are not excluded from the action of divine grace and from a link with the Church.
They must not, therefore, be deprived of pastoral assistance cf. They are not dispensed from the numerous obligations stemming from baptism. They ought to be concerned about the Christian education of their offspring.
The paths of Christian prayer, both public and private, penitence, and certain apostolic activities remain open to them. They must not be ignored but rather helped, like all other Christians who are trying, with the help of Christ s grace, to free themselves from sin.
The need for a pastoral action to avoid the multiplication of divorces and of new civil marriages of the divorced seems ever more urgent. But a lot of things I never did before I did on that day. In the wake of the retreat, Roberto and Marcia have seen a marked improvement in the quality of their marriage.
This has translated into big changes in their marriage and family life. Their Catholic faith enabled Roberto to experience powerful, life-changing religious rituals, and to become integrated into a religious community that embraces a positive, family-oriented ethos. It has helped them make the changes needed to strengthen their marriage and family life.
Specifically, my work with Nicholas Wolfinger in Soul Mates: Religion, Sex, Love, and Marriage Among African Americans and Latinos indicates that couples are substantially more likely to report being happy in their relationship when both partners attend church regularly than when neither partner does.
This result holds equally for whites, blacks, and Latinos, as the figure below indicates. In other words, religious couples are significantly more likely to enjoy wedded bliss than are their secular peers. Why does shared religious attendance lead to happiness? Part of the reason faith matters is that it fosters norms—such as a commitment to marital permanence and fidelity—that strengthen marriages.
My research indicates that two other mechanisms, one social and one devotional, also help explain the power of joint church attendance. First, almost half of jointly attending couples form the majority of their friendships with fellow parishioners. Attending religious services with friends accounts for more than half of the association between church attendance and relationship quality, which means that couples who have many shared friends at their church are happier than other couples.
These friends can also offer support when an intimate relationship hits the inevitable speed bump, and such friends may encourage each other, by example or the threat of stigma, to resist the temptation of an affair.
The figure below illustrates the link between shared religious friendships and relationship happiness. Second, couples in which both members attend church are more likely to say that they often pray together, and shared prayer also helps to account for the link between church attendance and a happy relationship. Previous studies show that prayer helps couples deal with stress, enables them to focus on shared beliefs and hopes for the future, and allows them to deal constructively with challenges and problems in their relationship, and in their lives.
In fact, we find that shared prayer is the most powerful religious predictor of relationship quality among black, Latino, and white couples, more powerful than denomination, religious attendance, or shared religious friendships. In simple terms, as the figure above also indicates, the couple that prays together, flourishes together. This finding holds for whites, African Americans, and Latinos alike. It is true that most people are happy in their relationships irrespective of church attendance, but black, Latino, and white couples who attend together enjoy an added boost here.
Part of the story here too may be due to selection couples who are happier together may also be inclined to do many things together, including attending church. Our evidence for this contention is our identification of two of the mechanisms through which religious participation improves relationship quality: religious friends and shared prayer. Couples who attend church together enjoy significantly happier relationships, in large part because they socialize with friends who share their faith and especially because they pray with one another.
Believe that your faith has everything to do with your romance, because it does. How can increased faith in the Savior help married couples strengthen their relationship with one another?
Answers may include those listed below. They become more Christlike in their treatment of each other. They become more loving, helpful, gentle, patient, and willing to listen to one another.
The more willing each spouse is to repent and become like the Savior, the more harmonious the marriage will be. In what ways can married couples work together to increase their faith in the Savior? Invite participants to share experiences that have strengthened their faith in the Savior.
Obey the laws and ordinances of the gospel. Share the following statement made by Bishop Robert D. Study the scriptures together. Read Helaman —8 with participants.
Trust in the Lord. Read Proverbs —6 with participants. What blessings can come when a husband and wife regularly kneel together in prayer? Encourage participants to share experiences that appropriately relate to this question. In addition, read the following quotation and one or both of the following examples.
0コメント